MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS HOW TO
MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS UPGRADE
MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS WINDOWS 10
MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS CODE

Role segregation is not just about load distribution. It depends on size, so it seems we’re all in agreement here Ok, but then this was exactly the OP’s point, to which you responded “Why would you ever do that?. Well yes, of course a company with 20 computers is a very, very different case 🙂

MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS UPGRADE

You see, when you have only one role on the server, it’s much, much, MUCH easier to reboot it, upgrade it, do maintenance on it than on the server where there are dozens of very different critical services running, each of which might have it’s own needs/requirements… When you do maintenance on such a monolithic server, you’re basically taking down entire infra and there’s much higher risk that one or another role/service will fail after maintenance.Īlso, if any single service/role gets compromised on such a monolithic server, you are totally screwed, since it means complete takeover of all your infra. It’s mostly about security, interoperability issues and ease of upgrades. Sure if you have load issues, then dividing the high usage processes makes sense, but otherwise I’d recommend just keeping it simple This was the case at one of the places I worked at with about 20 desktop computers.

It increases operational and licensing costs for not much benefit. But not all enterprises warrant dedicated servers for each function. And, with this new project, they propose to change to something completely different yet again, not that a web-based system wouldn’t be an improvement at this point. I actually liked the Microsoft admin tools the way they were even though they were somewhat limited, as compared to what the situation is now.

MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS WINDOWS 10

Recently things have gotten even more frustrating as Microsoft attempts a half-assed move of their admin tools to the Server Manager (a bloated modern-UI mess), which has made server management kind of like managing a Windows 10 desktop: an inconsistent half-assed jumble with conflicting documentation and uninformative diagnostic messages. That an PowerShell being the most overly verbose interactive CLI I’ve ever dealt with, and that includes OpenVMS and Juniper SRX.

MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS CODE

Not many things more annoying than seeing something fail with an obscure error code that’s not even documented in Microsoft’s own reference material. It’s troubleshooting the Microsoft Way (TM) when it doesn’t work that I hate.

Personally? I’m happy to be back in the land of unix/linux system administration. It’s worth learning the Microsoft Way(tm) if you’re going to manage Microsoft systems on a large scale. Adding PowerShell to the mix made it even more powerful.Įvery operating system has it’s own paradigm– treating a windows desktop like a linux desktop would be disastrous, but equally, treating a linux desktop like a windows desktop would be ridiculous.

MICROSOFT LYNC FOR MAC OS HOW TO

I suspect most people who complain about the lack of capability in ADuc/GPO/GPP/etc never really learned how to take maximum advantage of the available tools. Some additional command line tools were required for bulk operations (sysinternals, primarily), although PowerShell eliminated most of the need for those. It does take a fair amount of work to learn– and it’s not as straightforward as it could be. Those who know me should be amused, since for a long time, I argued against the Microsoft infrastructure– but then I transferred to a job where the entire ecosystem was Microsoft, and I hate reimplementing the wheel, so I dug in, and learned the Microsoft way. I’ve seen packages that aim to replace all that with a unified engine (LAN Desk is used at my current enterprise), and frankly, other than having a custom interface, I’m seeing very little I couldn’t do from within a well designed AD environment. The only real complaint I had was that you couldn’t add group policy objects to actual groups– You had to add it to an OU, and use groups to filter whether it was applied or not.

Printers, drive mappings, workstation policies– these were all relatively simple. We were distributing some very complex firewall rules (all admin / remote access was locked down to our admin stations and the DC) and if we needed to add a package to a system, or a group of systems, we just added them to the group for that software. I keep hearing the tools weren’t/aren’t up to snuff, but we never ran into a problem we couldn’t handle with native tools except inventory (ran an open source package via GPO’s to handle that). Always felt clunky by comparison with NDS. I would have thought the distributed nature of your tree would have been more of a challenge, but I suppose they’ve improved AD synchronization.

Microsoft lync for mac os